Skip to content

Utilities: We Know We Need to Adapt. Where Do We Start?

Insights Utilities: We Know We Need to Adapt. Where Do We Start?
Hansen News
Written By

Hansen News

A recent study by MIT Sloan and Capgemini found that 90% of CEOs believed the digital economy would have a major impact on their industry. However, the study also found that only 25% had a plan in place to address it and less than 15% were funding and executing that digital transformation plan. That’s a significant disparity between awareness and execution across all industries.

The utility industry, to its credit, has the awareness piece down. Often seen as a laggard compared to other faster-changing industries like TV and telco, most large energy companies across the world have embraced transformation in their business models and technologies. But the utility industry still has a long way to go if it wants to future proof itself.

What Are Utilities Worried About?

The utility industry is in the middle of disruption and is aware of the challenges that face them.

According to UtilityDive, Security continues to be the top concern by a wide margin. Cybersecurity will be the top worry for energy companies for years to come. Evolving security threats continue to be a challenge, both on the front-end (operational infrastructure) and back-end (protecting customer information).

With Distributed Energy and Renewables disrupting the market, utilities are concerned both about DER policy (net metering, ownership, etc.) and how they can effectively integrate renewables.

 

Hansen

Aging infrastructure is also a concern, particularly for water utilities. AWWA’s State of the Water Industry survey found that “renewal and replacement of aging infrastructure” has consistently been the top issue facing the industry for several years in a row.

These then lead on to capital investment, the second biggest issue concerning utilities. The cost of upgrading infrastructure and technology is a significant barrier. It’s hard to replace aging infrastructure without financing. For utilities, many of those needed infrastructure projects should be thought of and positioned partially as security projects, since updating to new technology can significantly improve security.

Big external changes in the energy market are causing utilities to face more challenges than ever as well. In Europe, deregulation and new competition have created a fierce environment for retailers. Customers are expecting lower pricing levels, more transparency, and improved responsiveness. The relationship between utility and customer is no longer transactional. Customer acquisition and retention were ranked #1 and #2 in CXP’s Digital Utilities Survey of European utilities.

 

Hansen

Ingredients for a Competitive Strategy

Customer retention is still the top concern for utilities. But what makes utility customers switch in the first place?

While lower pricing is the most obvious reason, a recent DNV-GL survey found that 50% of Commercial & Industrial (C&I) customers switch suppliers for reasons OTHER than pricing including behind-the-meter products (21%), access to renewable energy products (14%), electric vehicle charging products (7%), and other reasons (8%).

For retail energy providers, the top strategy for retaining customers is sending email alerts and newsletters. This has an impact but won’t cut it as the only strategy. More innovative and competitive retailers are using things like online usage portals, e-commerce portals (to buy smart home devices), energy and service bundles, and rewards programs to keep customers loyal. Tools like multiple payment options, multiple touch points, and real-time usage are no longer seen as innovative. These are now expected.

Chat-bots are helpful in reducing costs and 67% of water retailers plan on investing in non-human voice interfaces in the next 12 months [1].  Some utilities have emphasized their partnerships with or started selling non-utility products like smart home controllers, energy efficient light bulbs, home security products and even insurance!

But ultimately, what is consistently found to be the best differentiation strategy is improving the quality of customer service.  Customer experience management will be the key and this goes beyond the CRM system and includes promotions, apps, social media, and portals.  Customers who use mobile platforms have been shown to be the most engaged and, more importantly, have a higher level of retention [2]. In an industry evolving this quickly, investing in happy customers is the best place to start.

 

[1] CXP 2017 – Digital Utilities: From Behind the Curve to Innovation

[2] UtilityWeek – The Future of Utilities Report 2018

1. What does “modernise with precision” mean for Tier-1 telecom operators?

“Modernise with precision” describes a low-risk, targeted approach to BSS/OSS modernisation where operators upgrade only the parts of their digital stack that create the greatest impact. Instead of embarking on high-risk, multi-year full-stack replacements, Tier-1 telcos selectively introduce cloud-native BSS/OSS, API-driven telecom architecture, AI-ready data layers, and TMF-compliant BSS components.
This modular strategy reduces cost and disruption, allowing operators to strengthen areas such as product agility, order orchestration, customer experience, and operational efficiency while maintaining stability in core environments. It aligns directly with TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA), which encourages a composable, interoperable, future-proof approach to telco transformation.

2. Why is time-to-market so important for telecom monetisation today?

Telecom monetisation increasingly depends on the ability to respond quickly to new commercial opportunities – from enterprise IoT solutions and digital services to 5G monetisation, wholesale partnerships, and B2B vertical offerings. In this environment, operators that can design, package, and activate new services in days rather than months gain a clear revenue advantage.
Legacy catalogues, rigid product hierarchies, and tightly coupled BSS architectures make rapid innovation difficult. Modern operators therefore prioritise catalog-driven architecture, agile/composable BSS, and cloud-native BSS capabilities to give business teams control over offer creation without relying on long IT delivery cycles. Faster launch cycles = faster monetisation.

 

3. What is slowing down product launch cycles for many telcos?

The primary obstacles are deeply entrenched in legacy architecture: hard-coded product models, outdated catalogues, nonstandard integrations, and heavy IT dependencies. These constraints slow down even minor product changes, creating friction between commercial teams and IT.
Modern telcos are replacing these bottlenecks with TMF-compliant BSS, cloud-native catalogues, API-driven BSS integrated via TMF Open APIs, and low/no-code configuration tools. These solutions allow product owners to create and test offers independently, ensuring the Digital BSS backbone supports true agility.

4. How can telecom operators reduce order fallout and manual intervention?

Order fallout typically stems from fragmented systems, inconsistent data models, and brittle custom integrations across BSS/OSS chains. When orchestration spans numerous legacy systems, even small discrepancies can cause orders to fail.
Operators can dramatically reduce fallout rates by adopting zero-touch service orchestration, modern order management modernisation, end-to-end automation, and a unified data model across their Digital OSS and Digital BSS layers. Cloud-native telecom systems and order orchestration for telecom remove reliance on manual rework, minimise delays, and improve service accuracy – all essential to delivering predictable customer experiences.

5. Why is accuracy so important for B2B and wholesale customer experience?

For enterprise and wholesale customers, trust is built on precision. A single misquote, incorrect configuration, or missed activation can lead to delays, SLA breaches, revenue disputes, and strained relationships. These segments rely on highly controlled, predictable fulfilment processes – particularly as operators expand into 5G edge services, network slicing, managed security, and outcome-based contracts.
Improving accuracy requires strengthening the underlying architecture – through modern CPQ for telecom, clean data models, cloud-native BSS/OSS, and robust API-driven telecom architecture. When quoting, ordering, provisioning, and billing are accurate, customer satisfaction increases naturally.

6. How does cloud, AI, and API-driven architecture support telecom modernisation?

Cloud-native platforms provide the scalability, flexibility, and deployment speed needed to support modern telecom services. AI introduces intelligence into operations, enabling predictive analytics, anomaly detection, and proactive assurance. APIs – especially TMF Open APIs – ensure new components integrate cleanly with legacy systems.
Together, AI-powered BSS/OSS, cloud-native architecture, and API-driven integration create a digital foundation that supports continuous innovation, reduces technical debt, and enables operators to deliver new services more efficiently. This trio is central to future-proofing the telco stack.

7. What is TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA) and why does it matter?

TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA) is an industry-standard framework designed to help telcos simplify, modularise, and modernise their BSS/OSS environments. ODA promotes interoperability, composability, and openness so operators can integrate new capabilities without heavy customisation or vendor lock-in.
For Tier-1 operators, ODA serves as a blueprint for transitioning from monolithic legacy stacks to cloud-native, API-driven, modular BSS/OSS infrastructure. By adopting ODA-aligned solutions, operators speed up integration, lower deployment risk, and reduce long-term operational cost.

8. How is Hansen involved in TM Forum and ODA?

Hansen aligns its architecture directly to TM Forum’s ODA principles and has contributed to the development of one of TM Forum’s recognised industry standards. This reinforces a commitment not just to following best practices, but to shaping them.
Hansen’s portfolio of cloud-native, AI-powered, API-driven Digital BSS/OSS modules is built on TMF Open APIs and composable design principles. This ensures seamless interoperability in multivendor environments and helps operators modernise safely and incrementally.

9. Can operators modernise their BSS/OSS without a full-stack replacement?

Yes – and in fact, most Tier-1 operators now prefer incremental transformation. Full-stack replacement is high risk, slow, and expensive. By contrast, modular modernisation allows operators to introduce new BSS/OSS capabilities – catalogues, orchestration layers, charging engines, customer management, monetisation components – without destabilising the existing ecosystem.
This approach reduces risk, accelerates value, and aligns with ODA’s principles of composability and openness. Operators can modernise at their own pace while still maintaining service continuity.

10. How does modular modernisation reduce risk?

Modular transformation focuses on improving specific parts of the architecture – such as product agility, order accuracy, unified data, or 5G monetisation – without changing everything at once. Each module is integrated, tested, and scaled independently, which reduces disruption and improves predictability.
It also allows operators to retire legacy systems gradually, reducing technical debt over time while still realising near-term efficiency and revenue gains. This is why agile/composable BSS is now the preferred model for Tier-1 telecom transformation.

11. What operational improvements can telcos expect from a unified data model?

A unified, AI-ready data model brings real-time visibility across commercial and operational processes, enabling faster decision-making and more reliable service execution. It also allows operators to detect issues earlier, automate root cause analysis, and reduce order fallout.
This consistent data foundation is essential for AI-powered BSS/OSS, predictive assurance, next-best-action recommendations, and advanced analytics. It ultimately improves operational efficiency, accuracy, and customer experience – three core pillars of modern telecom performance.

12. Why is Customer Experience (CX) tightly linked to operational excellence?

Most customer experience problems – delays, incorrect orders, billing errors, missed SLAs – originate from inefficiencies within the internal BSS/OSS engine. When operators modernise their Digital BSS/OSS processes, eliminate manual workarounds, and ensure accurate orchestration and service activation, the customer experience improves naturally.
This is particularly true for enterprise and wholesale customers, where CX is defined by precision, predictability, and contract performance. Improving CX requires improving the processes beneath it.

13. How do Hansen’s solutions fit into a Tier-1 telco transformation strategy?

Hansen provides cloud-native, API-driven, TMF-compliant, AI-powered Digital BSS/OSS modules that integrate smoothly into hybrid and legacy environments. Operators can use them to strengthen catalog agility, automate order flows, unify data, enhance monetisation, or improve service reliability – without needing to replace their entire BSS/OSS stack.
This flexibility supports transformation at the operator’s own pace, aligned to business priorities, regulatory requirements, and commercial objectives.

14. What benefits can operators expect from a layered or hybrid modernisation approach?

A layered or hybrid approach allows operators to combine existing systems with cloud-native components, enabling transformation without disruption. Key benefits include:
• Faster time-to-market for new offers
• Improved order accuracy and reduced fallout
• Lower cost-to-serve through automation
• Stronger customer experience
• Gradual reduction of technical debt
• Alignment with ODA and modular architecture principles
This approach balances stability with innovation – ideal for Tier-1 operators.

15. How do industry standards such as ODA accelerate telecom digital transformation?

Industry standards like TM Forum ODA and TMF Open APIs reduce integration complexity, promote interoperability, and give operators a trusted blueprint for modernisation. They ensure that new BSS/OSS components can plug into existing environments without custom engineering.
By reducing dependence on bespoke integrations and enabling modular deployment, standards significantly lower long-term cost and accelerate transformation across the business. They also future proof the architecture for new technologies, including AI, automation, and 5G service innovation.


 
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus vestibulum ut neque eu cursus. Donec eu lectus dictum, convallis lectus eget, porta lorem. Aliquam at lacus rutrum est viverra sollicitudin id eu diam. Sed magna diam, porttitor sed justo a, sodales convallis massa. Nam scelerisque diam in justo pharetra aliquam.