Skip to content

Order Management for Digital Services

Insights Order Management for Digital Services
Hansen News
Written By

Hansen News

The environment for communications service providers has changed forever. Consumers and businesses expect the order to activation (O2A) process for CSPs to mirror those of the likes of Amazon and Apple. Customers have no patience for failure in digital services – none whatsoever. So CSPs are under pressure to deliver complex, multi-faceted, and rapidly changing products while shackled by the confines of ill-equipped legacy platforms.

Innovations in digital ecosystems through the Internet of Things, business data services, and NFV/SDN infrastructures are being layered on top of traditional services and networks. Mergers and acquisitions are adding even more complexity to the IT landscape.

At the heart of this complex environment lies the CSP’s order management system. The system must be equipped to handle orders from any channel, for any type of product – single or bundled – for delivery across a hybrid of networks, devices and partner eco-systems.

How can service providers overcome the challenges of an ever-changing digital landscape to provide the zero-touch, zero-fallout experience their customers expect? The answer: order management purpose-built to quickly launch and deliver new digital products, consistently and with order fallout rates of less than 0.1%.

Legacy Order Management will Fail in the Digital Age

Without a centralised view of what is being sold, who it is being sold to and what is technically feasible to sell, communications service providers can expect weeks, if not months of delays for delivering new products. In order to consistently launch new digital products in this complex environment, it is crucial that order management systems be driven by a centralised product, service and resource catalog.

Most order management software vendors claim today that they are catalog-driven. However, for many vendors this simply means loading data from disparate repositories (data silos) into custom tables held within the order management system. The data quickly ages as new product offerings are created and handed off from one team to another for enrichment of various aspects of the model until they are ready for consumption by the order management team.  This “waterfall” approach to defining the specifications that drive order management is costly, time-consuming, fragile and error-prone. Without collaboration tools, it can take weeks or even months for individual teams to first define, then debug their respective aspects of the model and for the order management team to re-sync the data.

An alternative, though certainly not superior, approach is to perform a synchronous pull of the data needed for fulfillment from the various data silos into custom tables held within the order management system. To be effective, this approach requires data to be pre-synced across repositories prior to import, which is only possible with sophisticated debugging and collaboration tools for the various model stakeholders.  In the absence of these tools, fulfilment modellers end up coordinating the debugging and data re-syncing processes across the various teams.

With both of these traditional architectures, stakeholders are forced to work in an environment without an end-to-end view of the data model and without the tools needed for collaborative, real-time enrichment of the model as offerings evolve. The resulting “information disconnect” means that launching new products is a long, labor-intensive, fragile and error prone process.

Order Management in the Digital Age

Next generation order management systems, worthy of the pressures facing a digital service provider, have been architected from the ground up to be enterprise catalog-driven. They place an emphasis on collaborative tools that allow product managers, fulfilment designers and others to work collectively on the master model and fulfilment strategies.

The key characteristics of a truly next generation order management solution are:

Enterprise Catalog-Driven by Design
  • Referring dynamically to an external, comprehensive catalog to ensure that the business rules for products, services and resources (whether commercial or technical) are accurately utilised during fulfilment
  • Viewing the end-to-end product, service and resource model along with associated fulfilment configurations from a single console
  • Collaborating between Product Managers and Fulfilment Designers within a cohesive specification-to-workflow environment
Design-time Validation of Configurations
  • Validating the end-to-end fulfilment configuration prior to deployment to runtime provides fulfilment designers with the confidence to know what they are modelling will work.
  • Generating order instance scenarios at design-time in order to see what the fulfilment model would look like at runtime
Full End-to-End Visualisation
  • End-to-end tracking of orders through the system from the moment they are received through to assessing validity and orchestrating delivery
  • Accessing the orchestration flows graphically at both business and system interaction (technical) levels
  • Providing design-time visualisation of proposed orchestration plans for order instances
Purpose Built for Order Orchestration
  • Providing full product life cycle modelling, validation, decomposition and reflection services as well as Master Data Management (MDM) of the full PSR model
  • Being highly scalable and performant supporting hundreds of thousands to millions of complex orders per day, including real time scalability to handle increased volumes
Industry Standards Compliance
  • Complying with TM Forum standards, including Business Process, Information and Application Frameworks
  • Using Business Process Modelling & Notation (BPMNv2) in all workflow modelling for both business and technical workflows
  • Complying with TM Forum OSS/J JSR264 Order API specification

This architecture results in a truly agile environment capable of rapidly responding to the needs of the business and allows providers to orchestrate services of any type, from any channel, across any system stack and any network.

With true enterprise catalog-driven order management, the old, unfulfilled promises of time-to-market for new offerings, precision in fulfilment and customer satisfaction can be finally realised, delivering against the new realities of the digital world in which customers expect compelling new products to be provided at the press of a button or the flick of a switch.

1. What does “modernise with precision” mean for Tier-1 telecom operators?

“Modernise with precision” describes a low-risk, targeted approach to BSS/OSS modernisation where operators upgrade only the parts of their digital stack that create the greatest impact. Instead of embarking on high-risk, multi-year full-stack replacements, Tier-1 telcos selectively introduce cloud-native BSS/OSS, API-driven telecom architecture, AI-ready data layers, and TMF-compliant BSS components.
This modular strategy reduces cost and disruption, allowing operators to strengthen areas such as product agility, order orchestration, customer experience, and operational efficiency while maintaining stability in core environments. It aligns directly with TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA), which encourages a composable, interoperable, future-proof approach to telco transformation.

2. Why is time-to-market so important for telecom monetisation today?

Telecom monetisation increasingly depends on the ability to respond quickly to new commercial opportunities – from enterprise IoT solutions and digital services to 5G monetisation, wholesale partnerships, and B2B vertical offerings. In this environment, operators that can design, package, and activate new services in days rather than months gain a clear revenue advantage.
Legacy catalogues, rigid product hierarchies, and tightly coupled BSS architectures make rapid innovation difficult. Modern operators therefore prioritise catalog-driven architecture, agile/composable BSS, and cloud-native BSS capabilities to give business teams control over offer creation without relying on long IT delivery cycles. Faster launch cycles = faster monetisation.

 

3. What is slowing down product launch cycles for many telcos?

The primary obstacles are deeply entrenched in legacy architecture: hard-coded product models, outdated catalogues, nonstandard integrations, and heavy IT dependencies. These constraints slow down even minor product changes, creating friction between commercial teams and IT.
Modern telcos are replacing these bottlenecks with TMF-compliant BSS, cloud-native catalogues, API-driven BSS integrated via TMF Open APIs, and low/no-code configuration tools. These solutions allow product owners to create and test offers independently, ensuring the Digital BSS backbone supports true agility.

4. How can telecom operators reduce order fallout and manual intervention?

Order fallout typically stems from fragmented systems, inconsistent data models, and brittle custom integrations across BSS/OSS chains. When orchestration spans numerous legacy systems, even small discrepancies can cause orders to fail.
Operators can dramatically reduce fallout rates by adopting zero-touch service orchestration, modern order management modernisation, end-to-end automation, and a unified data model across their Digital OSS and Digital BSS layers. Cloud-native telecom systems and order orchestration for telecom remove reliance on manual rework, minimise delays, and improve service accuracy – all essential to delivering predictable customer experiences.

5. Why is accuracy so important for B2B and wholesale customer experience?

For enterprise and wholesale customers, trust is built on precision. A single misquote, incorrect configuration, or missed activation can lead to delays, SLA breaches, revenue disputes, and strained relationships. These segments rely on highly controlled, predictable fulfilment processes – particularly as operators expand into 5G edge services, network slicing, managed security, and outcome-based contracts.
Improving accuracy requires strengthening the underlying architecture – through modern CPQ for telecom, clean data models, cloud-native BSS/OSS, and robust API-driven telecom architecture. When quoting, ordering, provisioning, and billing are accurate, customer satisfaction increases naturally.

6. How does cloud, AI, and API-driven architecture support telecom modernisation?

Cloud-native platforms provide the scalability, flexibility, and deployment speed needed to support modern telecom services. AI introduces intelligence into operations, enabling predictive analytics, anomaly detection, and proactive assurance. APIs – especially TMF Open APIs – ensure new components integrate cleanly with legacy systems.
Together, AI-powered BSS/OSS, cloud-native architecture, and API-driven integration create a digital foundation that supports continuous innovation, reduces technical debt, and enables operators to deliver new services more efficiently. This trio is central to future-proofing the telco stack.

7. What is TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA) and why does it matter?

TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA) is an industry-standard framework designed to help telcos simplify, modularise, and modernise their BSS/OSS environments. ODA promotes interoperability, composability, and openness so operators can integrate new capabilities without heavy customisation or vendor lock-in.
For Tier-1 operators, ODA serves as a blueprint for transitioning from monolithic legacy stacks to cloud-native, API-driven, modular BSS/OSS infrastructure. By adopting ODA-aligned solutions, operators speed up integration, lower deployment risk, and reduce long-term operational cost.

8. How is Hansen involved in TM Forum and ODA?

Hansen aligns its architecture directly to TM Forum’s ODA principles and has contributed to the development of one of TM Forum’s recognised industry standards. This reinforces a commitment not just to following best practices, but to shaping them.
Hansen’s portfolio of cloud-native, AI-powered, API-driven Digital BSS/OSS modules is built on TMF Open APIs and composable design principles. This ensures seamless interoperability in multivendor environments and helps operators modernise safely and incrementally.

9. Can operators modernise their BSS/OSS without a full-stack replacement?

Yes – and in fact, most Tier-1 operators now prefer incremental transformation. Full-stack replacement is high risk, slow, and expensive. By contrast, modular modernisation allows operators to introduce new BSS/OSS capabilities – catalogues, orchestration layers, charging engines, customer management, monetisation components – without destabilising the existing ecosystem.
This approach reduces risk, accelerates value, and aligns with ODA’s principles of composability and openness. Operators can modernise at their own pace while still maintaining service continuity.

10. How does modular modernisation reduce risk?

Modular transformation focuses on improving specific parts of the architecture – such as product agility, order accuracy, unified data, or 5G monetisation – without changing everything at once. Each module is integrated, tested, and scaled independently, which reduces disruption and improves predictability.
It also allows operators to retire legacy systems gradually, reducing technical debt over time while still realising near-term efficiency and revenue gains. This is why agile/composable BSS is now the preferred model for Tier-1 telecom transformation.

11. What operational improvements can telcos expect from a unified data model?

A unified, AI-ready data model brings real-time visibility across commercial and operational processes, enabling faster decision-making and more reliable service execution. It also allows operators to detect issues earlier, automate root cause analysis, and reduce order fallout.
This consistent data foundation is essential for AI-powered BSS/OSS, predictive assurance, next-best-action recommendations, and advanced analytics. It ultimately improves operational efficiency, accuracy, and customer experience – three core pillars of modern telecom performance.

12. Why is Customer Experience (CX) tightly linked to operational excellence?

Most customer experience problems – delays, incorrect orders, billing errors, missed SLAs – originate from inefficiencies within the internal BSS/OSS engine. When operators modernise their Digital BSS/OSS processes, eliminate manual workarounds, and ensure accurate orchestration and service activation, the customer experience improves naturally.
This is particularly true for enterprise and wholesale customers, where CX is defined by precision, predictability, and contract performance. Improving CX requires improving the processes beneath it.

13. How do Hansen’s solutions fit into a Tier-1 telco transformation strategy?

Hansen provides cloud-native, API-driven, TMF-compliant, AI-powered Digital BSS/OSS modules that integrate smoothly into hybrid and legacy environments. Operators can use them to strengthen catalog agility, automate order flows, unify data, enhance monetisation, or improve service reliability – without needing to replace their entire BSS/OSS stack.
This flexibility supports transformation at the operator’s own pace, aligned to business priorities, regulatory requirements, and commercial objectives.

14. What benefits can operators expect from a layered or hybrid modernisation approach?

A layered or hybrid approach allows operators to combine existing systems with cloud-native components, enabling transformation without disruption. Key benefits include:
• Faster time-to-market for new offers
• Improved order accuracy and reduced fallout
• Lower cost-to-serve through automation
• Stronger customer experience
• Gradual reduction of technical debt
• Alignment with ODA and modular architecture principles
This approach balances stability with innovation – ideal for Tier-1 operators.

15. How do industry standards such as ODA accelerate telecom digital transformation?

Industry standards like TM Forum ODA and TMF Open APIs reduce integration complexity, promote interoperability, and give operators a trusted blueprint for modernisation. They ensure that new BSS/OSS components can plug into existing environments without custom engineering.
By reducing dependence on bespoke integrations and enabling modular deployment, standards significantly lower long-term cost and accelerate transformation across the business. They also future proof the architecture for new technologies, including AI, automation, and 5G service innovation.


 
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus vestibulum ut neque eu cursus. Donec eu lectus dictum, convallis lectus eget, porta lorem. Aliquam at lacus rutrum est viverra sollicitudin id eu diam. Sed magna diam, porttitor sed justo a, sodales convallis massa. Nam scelerisque diam in justo pharetra aliquam.