Skip to content

GenAI Is Rewriting the Energy Sector – But Only If You Treat It Like a Teammate, not a Tool

Insights GenAI Is Rewriting the Energy Sector – But Only If You Treat It Like a Teammate, not a Tool
Nick Nikolitsis
Written By

Nick Nikolitsis

We’re standing at the edge of a generational shift in the energy industry. One where GenAI isn’t just helping optimise customer interactions, it’s redefining what “service” even means. The old model of reactive, transactional customer support is giving way to predictive, adaptive engagement.

If we get it right, customers may never need to ask a question again.

But let’s be clear: there’s as much risk here as there is reward. Treat GenAI like a magic wand, and you’ll hallucinate your way into reputational damage. Treat it like a teammate, carefully trained, clearly guided, and respected for what it can’t do, and you unlock real competitive advantage.

The use of generative AI in energy is no longer hypothetical; it’s happening now. Yet success isn’t measured by whether you’ve deployed a chatbot or automated some back-office workflows. The winners in this space will be the companies who strike a careful balance between innovation and control, between automation and humanity. That balanced approach needs to extend to how you set goals for your AI as well. If you drive it with only a single metric, say, minimising average call time, the AI will find a way to hit that target, often at the expense of quality or customer satisfaction. Instead, define success across multiple dimensions: make sure your GenAI agent is optimising for efficiency, accuracy, compliance, and customer happiness together, so it can’t game the system by sacrificing one outcome for another.

Start Simple, Stay Smart

Energy providers shouldn’t dive into GenAI with the expectation of solving the hardest problems first. Start small. Use AI to field routine customer queries, book service appointments, or send proactive outage alerts. Keep the complex, nuanced cases, like hardship policies, billing disputes, or support for vulnerable customers, for well-trained humans who can empathise and exercise discretion. Even when you hand certain tasks over to the AI, keep a human in the loop for the big decisions. That means inserting manual checkpoints for high-impact actions: if the AI is about to implement a major account change or send out a sensitive communication, a person should review and approve it first.

Your AI doesn’t need to be all-knowing; it needs to be trained. That means running pilots with friendly internal staff, pressure-testing use cases, and learning from failure before rolling out to production. Let your teams break things in testing, not in front of customers. Just like your digital ecosystems, quality and full feature sets rule.
While you’re piloting, also try breaking tasks into smaller, modular steps with a validation check after each one. This way, a minor mistake can be caught and corrected early rather than compounding into a larger problem. For especially critical processes, you might even deploy two AI models in parallel to double-check each other’s outputs, if their answers differ, that’s a red flag to pause and investigate before any action is taken.

Guardrails, Not Guesswork

Hallucination is a real risk. We’ve all seen the headlines: AI agents confidently delivering inaccurate or misleading information. You can’t afford that in a regulated sector like energy. That’s why industry-specific FAQs, documented flows, and clearly articulated “do and don’t” scopes for your agents are essential. You should also give your AI a firm grounding in real data, connect it to a verified internal knowledge base or document store so it pulls facts from a trusted source instead of making them up. You wouldn’t let a new hire talk to customers without a playbook; your AI deserves the same. Those “do and don’t” guidelines should serve as explicit constraints on what the AI can and cannot do, effectively giving it a built-in ethical compass during decision-making.

Another key guardrail is transparency. Make sure the AI keeps an action log or even a “chain-of-thought” trace of how it reaches its conclusions. This way, if something ever goes sideways, you can retrace the AI’s steps, audit its reasoning, and quickly pinpoint what went wrong (and why).

And privacy? That’s non-negotiable. Keep your LLM instances private, off the public internet. Build in strong security guardrails from the start. For example, restrict the AI’s access to sensitive systems using role-based permissions, and limit the actions it can perform to a predefined allow list of approved commands. On top of that, put filters in place for potentially malicious inputs, a layer to detect and sanitise prompt injection attacks before they cause any harm.

A smart approach also means making the model your own, not just embedding knowledge, but also your company’s tone, processes, and priorities. Embed your internal process documents directly into the model. Train it not just on what you do, but how you do it. However, customising your AI isn’t only about knowledge, it’s about values too. Be sure to conduct regular bias audits on the data and the AI’s outputs to catch any unintended skew. This ensures your AI doesn’t inadvertently amplify biases and that it treats all customers fairly, in line with your company’s standards.

Teach Your AI the Industry

Don’t expect a general-purpose LLM to know what a tariff code is, or why a customer might be on a demand time-of-use plan. You must build industry awareness into the model; otherwise, you’re starting every conversation with a blank slate. Imagine on boarding a new employee with no knowledge of utilities, regulations, or customer expectations.

That’s your GenAI agent, untrained. Industry-specific context, vocabulary, and workflows must be deeply embedded. It’s the difference between a helpful assistant and a glorified autocomplete engine.

It’s Not Just About Cost

Let’s not pretend money isn’t a major factor. GenAI promises significant cost savings through automation, reduced handle time, fewer errors, and increased scalability. But cost alone isn’t the metric. You’re also buying flexibility, speed, and the ability to continuously adapt.

That’s why understanding your AI vendor’s commercial model is crucial – subscription-based? usage-based? hybrid? It matters.

Get this wrong and your cost-to-serve could spiral; get it right, and you unlock transformative ROI. At the end of the day, customers will choose providers who balance service, value, and trust. GenAI can help you win on all three, but only if you wield it wisely.

The Human Element Isn’t Going Anywhere

The myth that AI will replace human agents en masse is just that: a myth. What we’re really doing is redeploying human empathy and expertise to where it matters most. AI handles the repetitive; people handle the personal.

That might be the most important shift of all, and it needs to be managed carefully. Keep an eye on the ripple effects of this change: retrain and upskill your team to mitigate any job displacement and pay attention to customer sentiment so that trust isn’t eroded as more interactions become automated. In the coming years, the best-performing energy providers won’t just use GenAI, they’ll partner with it. Train it. Teach it. Trust it with the right guardrails.

To learn more about how Hansen’s GenAI solutions can revolutionise customer experience, click here.

1. What does “modernise with precision” mean for Tier-1 telecom operators?

“Modernise with precision” describes a low-risk, targeted approach to BSS/OSS modernisation where operators upgrade only the parts of their digital stack that create the greatest impact. Instead of embarking on high-risk, multi-year full-stack replacements, Tier-1 telcos selectively introduce cloud-native BSS/OSS, API-driven telecom architecture, AI-ready data layers, and TMF-compliant BSS components.
This modular strategy reduces cost and disruption, allowing operators to strengthen areas such as product agility, order orchestration, customer experience, and operational efficiency while maintaining stability in core environments. It aligns directly with TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA), which encourages a composable, interoperable, future-proof approach to telco transformation.

2. Why is time-to-market so important for telecom monetisation today?

Telecom monetisation increasingly depends on the ability to respond quickly to new commercial opportunities – from enterprise IoT solutions and digital services to 5G monetisation, wholesale partnerships, and B2B vertical offerings. In this environment, operators that can design, package, and activate new services in days rather than months gain a clear revenue advantage.
Legacy catalogues, rigid product hierarchies, and tightly coupled BSS architectures make rapid innovation difficult. Modern operators therefore prioritise catalog-driven architecture, agile/composable BSS, and cloud-native BSS capabilities to give business teams control over offer creation without relying on long IT delivery cycles. Faster launch cycles = faster monetisation.

 

3. What is slowing down product launch cycles for many telcos?

The primary obstacles are deeply entrenched in legacy architecture: hard-coded product models, outdated catalogues, nonstandard integrations, and heavy IT dependencies. These constraints slow down even minor product changes, creating friction between commercial teams and IT.
Modern telcos are replacing these bottlenecks with TMF-compliant BSS, cloud-native catalogues, API-driven BSS integrated via TMF Open APIs, and low/no-code configuration tools. These solutions allow product owners to create and test offers independently, ensuring the Digital BSS backbone supports true agility.

4. How can telecom operators reduce order fallout and manual intervention?

Order fallout typically stems from fragmented systems, inconsistent data models, and brittle custom integrations across BSS/OSS chains. When orchestration spans numerous legacy systems, even small discrepancies can cause orders to fail.
Operators can dramatically reduce fallout rates by adopting zero-touch service orchestration, modern order management modernisation, end-to-end automation, and a unified data model across their Digital OSS and Digital BSS layers. Cloud-native telecom systems and order orchestration for telecom remove reliance on manual rework, minimise delays, and improve service accuracy – all essential to delivering predictable customer experiences.

5. Why is accuracy so important for B2B and wholesale customer experience?

For enterprise and wholesale customers, trust is built on precision. A single misquote, incorrect configuration, or missed activation can lead to delays, SLA breaches, revenue disputes, and strained relationships. These segments rely on highly controlled, predictable fulfilment processes – particularly as operators expand into 5G edge services, network slicing, managed security, and outcome-based contracts.
Improving accuracy requires strengthening the underlying architecture – through modern CPQ for telecom, clean data models, cloud-native BSS/OSS, and robust API-driven telecom architecture. When quoting, ordering, provisioning, and billing are accurate, customer satisfaction increases naturally.

6. How does cloud, AI, and API-driven architecture support telecom modernisation?

Cloud-native platforms provide the scalability, flexibility, and deployment speed needed to support modern telecom services. AI introduces intelligence into operations, enabling predictive analytics, anomaly detection, and proactive assurance. APIs – especially TMF Open APIs – ensure new components integrate cleanly with legacy systems.
Together, AI-powered BSS/OSS, cloud-native architecture, and API-driven integration create a digital foundation that supports continuous innovation, reduces technical debt, and enables operators to deliver new services more efficiently. This trio is central to future-proofing the telco stack.

7. What is TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA) and why does it matter?

TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA) is an industry-standard framework designed to help telcos simplify, modularise, and modernise their BSS/OSS environments. ODA promotes interoperability, composability, and openness so operators can integrate new capabilities without heavy customisation or vendor lock-in.
For Tier-1 operators, ODA serves as a blueprint for transitioning from monolithic legacy stacks to cloud-native, API-driven, modular BSS/OSS infrastructure. By adopting ODA-aligned solutions, operators speed up integration, lower deployment risk, and reduce long-term operational cost.

8. How is Hansen involved in TM Forum and ODA?

Hansen aligns its architecture directly to TM Forum’s ODA principles and has contributed to the development of one of TM Forum’s recognised industry standards. This reinforces a commitment not just to following best practices, but to shaping them.
Hansen’s portfolio of cloud-native, AI-powered, API-driven Digital BSS/OSS modules is built on TMF Open APIs and composable design principles. This ensures seamless interoperability in multivendor environments and helps operators modernise safely and incrementally.

9. Can operators modernise their BSS/OSS without a full-stack replacement?

Yes – and in fact, most Tier-1 operators now prefer incremental transformation. Full-stack replacement is high risk, slow, and expensive. By contrast, modular modernisation allows operators to introduce new BSS/OSS capabilities – catalogues, orchestration layers, charging engines, customer management, monetisation components – without destabilising the existing ecosystem.
This approach reduces risk, accelerates value, and aligns with ODA’s principles of composability and openness. Operators can modernise at their own pace while still maintaining service continuity.

10. How does modular modernisation reduce risk?

Modular transformation focuses on improving specific parts of the architecture – such as product agility, order accuracy, unified data, or 5G monetisation – without changing everything at once. Each module is integrated, tested, and scaled independently, which reduces disruption and improves predictability.
It also allows operators to retire legacy systems gradually, reducing technical debt over time while still realising near-term efficiency and revenue gains. This is why agile/composable BSS is now the preferred model for Tier-1 telecom transformation.

11. What operational improvements can telcos expect from a unified data model?

A unified, AI-ready data model brings real-time visibility across commercial and operational processes, enabling faster decision-making and more reliable service execution. It also allows operators to detect issues earlier, automate root cause analysis, and reduce order fallout.
This consistent data foundation is essential for AI-powered BSS/OSS, predictive assurance, next-best-action recommendations, and advanced analytics. It ultimately improves operational efficiency, accuracy, and customer experience – three core pillars of modern telecom performance.

12. Why is Customer Experience (CX) tightly linked to operational excellence?

Most customer experience problems – delays, incorrect orders, billing errors, missed SLAs – originate from inefficiencies within the internal BSS/OSS engine. When operators modernise their Digital BSS/OSS processes, eliminate manual workarounds, and ensure accurate orchestration and service activation, the customer experience improves naturally.
This is particularly true for enterprise and wholesale customers, where CX is defined by precision, predictability, and contract performance. Improving CX requires improving the processes beneath it.

13. How do Hansen’s solutions fit into a Tier-1 telco transformation strategy?

Hansen provides cloud-native, API-driven, TMF-compliant, AI-powered Digital BSS/OSS modules that integrate smoothly into hybrid and legacy environments. Operators can use them to strengthen catalog agility, automate order flows, unify data, enhance monetisation, or improve service reliability – without needing to replace their entire BSS/OSS stack.
This flexibility supports transformation at the operator’s own pace, aligned to business priorities, regulatory requirements, and commercial objectives.

14. What benefits can operators expect from a layered or hybrid modernisation approach?

A layered or hybrid approach allows operators to combine existing systems with cloud-native components, enabling transformation without disruption. Key benefits include:
• Faster time-to-market for new offers
• Improved order accuracy and reduced fallout
• Lower cost-to-serve through automation
• Stronger customer experience
• Gradual reduction of technical debt
• Alignment with ODA and modular architecture principles
This approach balances stability with innovation – ideal for Tier-1 operators.

15. How do industry standards such as ODA accelerate telecom digital transformation?

Industry standards like TM Forum ODA and TMF Open APIs reduce integration complexity, promote interoperability, and give operators a trusted blueprint for modernisation. They ensure that new BSS/OSS components can plug into existing environments without custom engineering.
By reducing dependence on bespoke integrations and enabling modular deployment, standards significantly lower long-term cost and accelerate transformation across the business. They also future proof the architecture for new technologies, including AI, automation, and 5G service innovation.


 
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus vestibulum ut neque eu cursus. Donec eu lectus dictum, convallis lectus eget, porta lorem. Aliquam at lacus rutrum est viverra sollicitudin id eu diam. Sed magna diam, porttitor sed justo a, sodales convallis massa. Nam scelerisque diam in justo pharetra aliquam.