Skip to content

Why CSPs Must Overcome the Triple Constraint to Effectively Monetise 5G

Insights Why CSPs Must Overcome the Triple Constraint to Effectively Monetise 5G
Hansen News
Written By

Hansen News

Unlike its predecessor 4G, the pathway to monetising 5G is less certain and CSPs must adopt a more cost-effective and iterative approach to introducing new market offerings to find out what resonates with customers and what does not.

The uncertainty surrounding 5G monetisation demands a more exploratory and iterative approach by Communications Service Providers (CSPs). When it comes to introducing new market offerings, CSPs will want to avoid placing big bets on ventures which may inevitably fail. Instead, CSPs must determine through trial and innovation which new 5G services resonate with the market and quickly refine or abandon those which do not.

Achieving this ability to efficiently experiment with new 5G offerings underscores the need for CSPs to break free from the constraints imposed by their legacy Business Support Systems (BSS) and traditional proposition development processes. Specifically, they must be able to break free of the limitations of what is known more commonly in project management as the triple constraint.

Going to market under certainty

The development and launch of new products and services, across sectors, has traditionally been governed by the triple constraint framework which balances time, scope, and resources.

This approach, while effective in a stable and predictable market, becomes a hindrance when more fluid and dynamic working practices are required. The iterative nature required for new 5G service development, and the necessity to quickly adapt to market feedback, to offset uncertainty, calls for a departure from traditional proposition development methodologies. CSPs must embrace a more agile commercial operation model, one that enables rapid ideation, development, and deployment of new services.

This shift toward commercial agility is not just about accelerating time-to-market; it’s about transforming the way CSPs conceptualise and bring their offerings to customers. It involves reimagining processes to be more responsive to customer feedback, adapting quickly to market changes, and continuously refining service offerings.

It is no longer about sinking vast resources into a few broad options; it is more about throwing things at the wall, seeing what sticks, and doing so as quickly and cheaply as possible. For CSPs, this means adopting new strategies and tools that enable them to step outside the rigid boundaries of legacy systems and embrace the flexibility and responsiveness required to succeed in the 5G era. Only then can they fully exploit the potential of 5G, turning its technological promises into commercial successes.

The Triple Constraint Dilemma in 5G Monetisation

The triple constraint, also known as the iron triangle, posits that the quality of work is constrained by a project’s budget and resources, deadlines, and scope. Any change to one of these constraints invariably impacts the other two. While this framework has been instrumental in guiding countless projects to successful completion, it poses significant challenges when the work needs to be more fluid and adaptable.

In the context of proposition development, the triple constraint can bottleneck progress, especially when there’s a pressing need to innovate and move swiftly. A common scenario involves management teams pushing for faster release cycles to keep pace with the market. However, those responsible for delivering the commercial vision frequently find themselves in a bind when requests for additional resources to expedite development are often met with a firm ‘no’, and similarly, any proposal to reduce the scope to meet time constraints is typically rejected. This results in a frustrating impasse where the desire to move faster is continually hampered by the inflexible nature of the triple constraint framework.

This scenario highlights how projects bound by the triple constraint struggle to accommodate the agility and flexibility which will be required when developing new 5G propositions. Therefore, to monetise 5G, CSPs must find a way to frustrate the model and break free of its constraints to embrace a more fluid, responsive approach to service development and deployment.

The solution will be found in modern, cloud-native BSS which equip CSPs with advanced commercial capabilities and automation, allowing for significant legacy processes and ways of working to be overhauled, digitalised, and streamlined.

CSPs attempting to capitalise on 5G with legacy systems and operations in place face considerable challenges. Slow and rigid legacy systems could significantly delay the launch of new 5G services. Given the uncertainty about which offerings will resonate with customers, this approach makes each new 5G venture a high-risk endeavour. Many initial 5G services might not perform as expected, as CSPs search for the right formula for success. Therefore, it’s crucial for CSPs to adopt a more agile, iterative strategy.

Furthermore, adopting a faster, more cost-effective approach to introducing new market offerings means that even if a service doesn’t initially succeed, the relatively low time and financial investment in its market introduction makes it more feasible and less burdensome to adjust and improve based on feedback.

Breaking free of the triple restraint

In summary, the journey to monetising 5G marks a significant departure from the more predictable path of 4G. With 5G’s advanced capabilities and potential, the roadmap for successful monetisation is less clear-cut. Unlike the 4G era, there’s an element of experimentation in identifying which new 5G services will truly resonate with customers. This uncertainty necessitates a shift toward more agile commercial practices and operational models. CSPs must be equipped to rapidly develop and test new 5G services, quickly discerning the successful ventures from the less effective ones.

Crucial to this agile approach is breaking free from the inherent limitations of the triple constraint. To foster this flexibility, CSPs must implement new systems that embrace automation and efficiency, render time and resources as more fluid and adaptable. This evolution is not just a shift in technology but a cultural change towards greater agility, responsiveness and being led by performance data and insights.

Read the second part in the Hansen series ‘Breaking Free of the Triple Constraint to Monetise 5G and Sell Beyond the Connection’ where we explore the benefits CSPs can expect to realise once they have broken free of the triple constraint.

Bruce Williams
Product Marketing Manager
The Hansen Suite for Communications, Technology & Media

1. What does “modernise with precision” mean for Tier-1 telecom operators?

“Modernise with precision” describes a low-risk, targeted approach to BSS/OSS modernisation where operators upgrade only the parts of their digital stack that create the greatest impact. Instead of embarking on high-risk, multi-year full-stack replacements, Tier-1 telcos selectively introduce cloud-native BSS/OSS, API-driven telecom architecture, AI-ready data layers, and TMF-compliant BSS components.
This modular strategy reduces cost and disruption, allowing operators to strengthen areas such as product agility, order orchestration, customer experience, and operational efficiency while maintaining stability in core environments. It aligns directly with TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA), which encourages a composable, interoperable, future-proof approach to telco transformation.

2. Why is time-to-market so important for telecom monetisation today?

Telecom monetisation increasingly depends on the ability to respond quickly to new commercial opportunities – from enterprise IoT solutions and digital services to 5G monetisation, wholesale partnerships, and B2B vertical offerings. In this environment, operators that can design, package, and activate new services in days rather than months gain a clear revenue advantage.
Legacy catalogues, rigid product hierarchies, and tightly coupled BSS architectures make rapid innovation difficult. Modern operators therefore prioritise catalog-driven architecture, agile/composable BSS, and cloud-native BSS capabilities to give business teams control over offer creation without relying on long IT delivery cycles. Faster launch cycles = faster monetisation.

 

3. What is slowing down product launch cycles for many telcos?

The primary obstacles are deeply entrenched in legacy architecture: hard-coded product models, outdated catalogues, nonstandard integrations, and heavy IT dependencies. These constraints slow down even minor product changes, creating friction between commercial teams and IT.
Modern telcos are replacing these bottlenecks with TMF-compliant BSS, cloud-native catalogues, API-driven BSS integrated via TMF Open APIs, and low/no-code configuration tools. These solutions allow product owners to create and test offers independently, ensuring the Digital BSS backbone supports true agility.

4. How can telecom operators reduce order fallout and manual intervention?

Order fallout typically stems from fragmented systems, inconsistent data models, and brittle custom integrations across BSS/OSS chains. When orchestration spans numerous legacy systems, even small discrepancies can cause orders to fail.
Operators can dramatically reduce fallout rates by adopting zero-touch service orchestration, modern order management modernisation, end-to-end automation, and a unified data model across their Digital OSS and Digital BSS layers. Cloud-native telecom systems and order orchestration for telecom remove reliance on manual rework, minimise delays, and improve service accuracy – all essential to delivering predictable customer experiences.

5. Why is accuracy so important for B2B and wholesale customer experience?

For enterprise and wholesale customers, trust is built on precision. A single misquote, incorrect configuration, or missed activation can lead to delays, SLA breaches, revenue disputes, and strained relationships. These segments rely on highly controlled, predictable fulfilment processes – particularly as operators expand into 5G edge services, network slicing, managed security, and outcome-based contracts.
Improving accuracy requires strengthening the underlying architecture – through modern CPQ for telecom, clean data models, cloud-native BSS/OSS, and robust API-driven telecom architecture. When quoting, ordering, provisioning, and billing are accurate, customer satisfaction increases naturally.

6. How does cloud, AI, and API-driven architecture support telecom modernisation?

Cloud-native platforms provide the scalability, flexibility, and deployment speed needed to support modern telecom services. AI introduces intelligence into operations, enabling predictive analytics, anomaly detection, and proactive assurance. APIs – especially TMF Open APIs – ensure new components integrate cleanly with legacy systems.
Together, AI-powered BSS/OSS, cloud-native architecture, and API-driven integration create a digital foundation that supports continuous innovation, reduces technical debt, and enables operators to deliver new services more efficiently. This trio is central to future-proofing the telco stack.

7. What is TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA) and why does it matter?

TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA) is an industry-standard framework designed to help telcos simplify, modularise, and modernise their BSS/OSS environments. ODA promotes interoperability, composability, and openness so operators can integrate new capabilities without heavy customisation or vendor lock-in.
For Tier-1 operators, ODA serves as a blueprint for transitioning from monolithic legacy stacks to cloud-native, API-driven, modular BSS/OSS infrastructure. By adopting ODA-aligned solutions, operators speed up integration, lower deployment risk, and reduce long-term operational cost.

8. How is Hansen involved in TM Forum and ODA?

Hansen aligns its architecture directly to TM Forum’s ODA principles and has contributed to the development of one of TM Forum’s recognised industry standards. This reinforces a commitment not just to following best practices, but to shaping them.
Hansen’s portfolio of cloud-native, AI-powered, API-driven Digital BSS/OSS modules is built on TMF Open APIs and composable design principles. This ensures seamless interoperability in multivendor environments and helps operators modernise safely and incrementally.

9. Can operators modernise their BSS/OSS without a full-stack replacement?

Yes – and in fact, most Tier-1 operators now prefer incremental transformation. Full-stack replacement is high risk, slow, and expensive. By contrast, modular modernisation allows operators to introduce new BSS/OSS capabilities – catalogues, orchestration layers, charging engines, customer management, monetisation components – without destabilising the existing ecosystem.
This approach reduces risk, accelerates value, and aligns with ODA’s principles of composability and openness. Operators can modernise at their own pace while still maintaining service continuity.

10. How does modular modernisation reduce risk?

Modular transformation focuses on improving specific parts of the architecture – such as product agility, order accuracy, unified data, or 5G monetisation – without changing everything at once. Each module is integrated, tested, and scaled independently, which reduces disruption and improves predictability.
It also allows operators to retire legacy systems gradually, reducing technical debt over time while still realising near-term efficiency and revenue gains. This is why agile/composable BSS is now the preferred model for Tier-1 telecom transformation.

11. What operational improvements can telcos expect from a unified data model?

A unified, AI-ready data model brings real-time visibility across commercial and operational processes, enabling faster decision-making and more reliable service execution. It also allows operators to detect issues earlier, automate root cause analysis, and reduce order fallout.
This consistent data foundation is essential for AI-powered BSS/OSS, predictive assurance, next-best-action recommendations, and advanced analytics. It ultimately improves operational efficiency, accuracy, and customer experience – three core pillars of modern telecom performance.

12. Why is Customer Experience (CX) tightly linked to operational excellence?

Most customer experience problems – delays, incorrect orders, billing errors, missed SLAs – originate from inefficiencies within the internal BSS/OSS engine. When operators modernise their Digital BSS/OSS processes, eliminate manual workarounds, and ensure accurate orchestration and service activation, the customer experience improves naturally.
This is particularly true for enterprise and wholesale customers, where CX is defined by precision, predictability, and contract performance. Improving CX requires improving the processes beneath it.

13. How do Hansen’s solutions fit into a Tier-1 telco transformation strategy?

Hansen provides cloud-native, API-driven, TMF-compliant, AI-powered Digital BSS/OSS modules that integrate smoothly into hybrid and legacy environments. Operators can use them to strengthen catalog agility, automate order flows, unify data, enhance monetisation, or improve service reliability – without needing to replace their entire BSS/OSS stack.
This flexibility supports transformation at the operator’s own pace, aligned to business priorities, regulatory requirements, and commercial objectives.

14. What benefits can operators expect from a layered or hybrid modernisation approach?

A layered or hybrid approach allows operators to combine existing systems with cloud-native components, enabling transformation without disruption. Key benefits include:
• Faster time-to-market for new offers
• Improved order accuracy and reduced fallout
• Lower cost-to-serve through automation
• Stronger customer experience
• Gradual reduction of technical debt
• Alignment with ODA and modular architecture principles
This approach balances stability with innovation – ideal for Tier-1 operators.

15. How do industry standards such as ODA accelerate telecom digital transformation?

Industry standards like TM Forum ODA and TMF Open APIs reduce integration complexity, promote interoperability, and give operators a trusted blueprint for modernisation. They ensure that new BSS/OSS components can plug into existing environments without custom engineering.
By reducing dependence on bespoke integrations and enabling modular deployment, standards significantly lower long-term cost and accelerate transformation across the business. They also future proof the architecture for new technologies, including AI, automation, and 5G service innovation.


 
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus vestibulum ut neque eu cursus. Donec eu lectus dictum, convallis lectus eget, porta lorem. Aliquam at lacus rutrum est viverra sollicitudin id eu diam. Sed magna diam, porttitor sed justo a, sodales convallis massa. Nam scelerisque diam in justo pharetra aliquam.