Skip to content

Configuration: The Key to Agility for CSPs

Insights Configuration: The Key to Agility for CSPs
Hansen News
Written By

Hansen News

Hansen enables service providers to launch innovative new products quickly and profitably, to capitalise on the opportunities presented through digital services. A key part of our philosophy is this: configure first and code only when necessary.

What does that mean in a world of fragmented systems and complicated product propositions? And, more importantly, why is it important to CSPs?

Let’s start by looking at the alternative. With systems that are developed without a configuration-driven functional framework, bringing a new product to market requires specialist support – which is expensive and time-consuming – to create code that makes things happen. The drawbacks are obvious: it places strain on resources, extends time-to-market, and adds another point where errors can be made. And it makes one ask: shouldn’t systems be able to carry these things out without the need for coding?

Furthermore, as more and more code is added to enable new products and services, system complexity increases, which can cause major problems during upgrades.

Coding to enable the creation and launch of new products slows down processes and increases costs – not a good thing, especially in the 5G era.

Using configuration-driven software to drive product innovation addresses this and means that authorised users are able to bring new products to market without the need for specialist IT support. Using configurable templates and rules, service providers can ensure consistency in the way products are created (including the related workflow to get things ordered), and the ability to reuse and modify existing elements can massively improve efficiency.

Of course, the user has to understand the processes to configure a product (and don’t worry, there is a lot of training for that), but by removing the need to code in the first place, the power to create new products and services can be given to business-facing users without the need for additional IT and systems support.

And this really resonates with our customers. We recently won a contract to supply products from the Hansen Create-Deliver-Engage portfolio for CSPs to an APAC mobile operator which, during the buying process, explicitly stated that it was specifically looking for a solution which enabled it to configure new products, while minimizing the need for coding to shorten time-to-market and improve flexibility.

Are we saying that it’s all configuration, all the time, for our customers?  No, of course not. Acknowledging the realities of the industry, there will always be tasks that require coding, especially when it comes to integrating our software with systems and infrastructure either from other vendors, or within the service provider’s environment.

At Hansen, we believe in allowing service providers to protect their legacy investments, while we provide them with an agile overlay that positions them to take advantage of digital opportunities. That means we need to integrate with these legacy systems, which have been built up over time and are unique for each CSP.

This integration with external systems is a key component of any implementation of our software. And writing some specific code for these integrations is often the most efficient way to deal with the unique aspects of every deployment.

Key to minimizing the impact of this custom code is the ability for our products to provide frameworks wherein these specific code-based customizations can occur, while keeping them separate from the core product. This allows control over the impact of these customizations, and also makes the process of upgrading the underlying product software much easier.

So to truly deliver on the value of the configure first and code only when necessary ethos, these coding situations need to be around the edge of the application – not the central logic of it.

And that is what we have delivered at Hansen Technologies – the core domain of the products and the key use cases are all delivered through configuration and our model-driven paradigms.

When that core capability needs to be connected to other systems in the enterprise, or some very implementation-specific edge cases are required, then coding can be used, and the different skill sets of different classes of users can be brought to bear.

Coding in this sense is a fact of life, but Hansen believes that coding should not define your product innovation capability when creating products, or when defining the workflow to order products and services.

For service providers, perhaps the key question is how much is configuration, and how much is code, rather than looking at this as a simple, black-or-white issue. This is a question which should be asked for all stages of a project – from implementation through to everyday use. At Hansen Technologies, “configure first and code only when necessary” is a philosophy that runs throughout our portfolio, and is a central consideration when it comes to how we build software.

Brian Cappellani,
Senior Vice President of Engineering

1. What does “modernise with precision” mean for Tier-1 telecom operators?

“Modernise with precision” describes a low-risk, targeted approach to BSS/OSS modernisation where operators upgrade only the parts of their digital stack that create the greatest impact. Instead of embarking on high-risk, multi-year full-stack replacements, Tier-1 telcos selectively introduce cloud-native BSS/OSS, API-driven telecom architecture, AI-ready data layers, and TMF-compliant BSS components.
This modular strategy reduces cost and disruption, allowing operators to strengthen areas such as product agility, order orchestration, customer experience, and operational efficiency while maintaining stability in core environments. It aligns directly with TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA), which encourages a composable, interoperable, future-proof approach to telco transformation.

2. Why is time-to-market so important for telecom monetisation today?

Telecom monetisation increasingly depends on the ability to respond quickly to new commercial opportunities – from enterprise IoT solutions and digital services to 5G monetisation, wholesale partnerships, and B2B vertical offerings. In this environment, operators that can design, package, and activate new services in days rather than months gain a clear revenue advantage.
Legacy catalogues, rigid product hierarchies, and tightly coupled BSS architectures make rapid innovation difficult. Modern operators therefore prioritise catalog-driven architecture, agile/composable BSS, and cloud-native BSS capabilities to give business teams control over offer creation without relying on long IT delivery cycles. Faster launch cycles = faster monetisation.

 

3. What is slowing down product launch cycles for many telcos?

The primary obstacles are deeply entrenched in legacy architecture: hard-coded product models, outdated catalogues, nonstandard integrations, and heavy IT dependencies. These constraints slow down even minor product changes, creating friction between commercial teams and IT.
Modern telcos are replacing these bottlenecks with TMF-compliant BSS, cloud-native catalogues, API-driven BSS integrated via TMF Open APIs, and low/no-code configuration tools. These solutions allow product owners to create and test offers independently, ensuring the Digital BSS backbone supports true agility.

4. How can telecom operators reduce order fallout and manual intervention?

Order fallout typically stems from fragmented systems, inconsistent data models, and brittle custom integrations across BSS/OSS chains. When orchestration spans numerous legacy systems, even small discrepancies can cause orders to fail.
Operators can dramatically reduce fallout rates by adopting zero-touch service orchestration, modern order management modernisation, end-to-end automation, and a unified data model across their Digital OSS and Digital BSS layers. Cloud-native telecom systems and order orchestration for telecom remove reliance on manual rework, minimise delays, and improve service accuracy – all essential to delivering predictable customer experiences.

5. Why is accuracy so important for B2B and wholesale customer experience?

For enterprise and wholesale customers, trust is built on precision. A single misquote, incorrect configuration, or missed activation can lead to delays, SLA breaches, revenue disputes, and strained relationships. These segments rely on highly controlled, predictable fulfilment processes – particularly as operators expand into 5G edge services, network slicing, managed security, and outcome-based contracts.
Improving accuracy requires strengthening the underlying architecture – through modern CPQ for telecom, clean data models, cloud-native BSS/OSS, and robust API-driven telecom architecture. When quoting, ordering, provisioning, and billing are accurate, customer satisfaction increases naturally.

6. How does cloud, AI, and API-driven architecture support telecom modernisation?

Cloud-native platforms provide the scalability, flexibility, and deployment speed needed to support modern telecom services. AI introduces intelligence into operations, enabling predictive analytics, anomaly detection, and proactive assurance. APIs – especially TMF Open APIs – ensure new components integrate cleanly with legacy systems.
Together, AI-powered BSS/OSS, cloud-native architecture, and API-driven integration create a digital foundation that supports continuous innovation, reduces technical debt, and enables operators to deliver new services more efficiently. This trio is central to future-proofing the telco stack.

7. What is TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA) and why does it matter?

TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA) is an industry-standard framework designed to help telcos simplify, modularise, and modernise their BSS/OSS environments. ODA promotes interoperability, composability, and openness so operators can integrate new capabilities without heavy customisation or vendor lock-in.
For Tier-1 operators, ODA serves as a blueprint for transitioning from monolithic legacy stacks to cloud-native, API-driven, modular BSS/OSS infrastructure. By adopting ODA-aligned solutions, operators speed up integration, lower deployment risk, and reduce long-term operational cost.

8. How is Hansen involved in TM Forum and ODA?

Hansen aligns its architecture directly to TM Forum’s ODA principles and has contributed to the development of one of TM Forum’s recognised industry standards. This reinforces a commitment not just to following best practices, but to shaping them.
Hansen’s portfolio of cloud-native, AI-powered, API-driven Digital BSS/OSS modules is built on TMF Open APIs and composable design principles. This ensures seamless interoperability in multivendor environments and helps operators modernise safely and incrementally.

9. Can operators modernise their BSS/OSS without a full-stack replacement?

Yes – and in fact, most Tier-1 operators now prefer incremental transformation. Full-stack replacement is high risk, slow, and expensive. By contrast, modular modernisation allows operators to introduce new BSS/OSS capabilities – catalogues, orchestration layers, charging engines, customer management, monetisation components – without destabilising the existing ecosystem.
This approach reduces risk, accelerates value, and aligns with ODA’s principles of composability and openness. Operators can modernise at their own pace while still maintaining service continuity.

10. How does modular modernisation reduce risk?

Modular transformation focuses on improving specific parts of the architecture – such as product agility, order accuracy, unified data, or 5G monetisation – without changing everything at once. Each module is integrated, tested, and scaled independently, which reduces disruption and improves predictability.
It also allows operators to retire legacy systems gradually, reducing technical debt over time while still realising near-term efficiency and revenue gains. This is why agile/composable BSS is now the preferred model for Tier-1 telecom transformation.

11. What operational improvements can telcos expect from a unified data model?

A unified, AI-ready data model brings real-time visibility across commercial and operational processes, enabling faster decision-making and more reliable service execution. It also allows operators to detect issues earlier, automate root cause analysis, and reduce order fallout.
This consistent data foundation is essential for AI-powered BSS/OSS, predictive assurance, next-best-action recommendations, and advanced analytics. It ultimately improves operational efficiency, accuracy, and customer experience – three core pillars of modern telecom performance.

12. Why is Customer Experience (CX) tightly linked to operational excellence?

Most customer experience problems – delays, incorrect orders, billing errors, missed SLAs – originate from inefficiencies within the internal BSS/OSS engine. When operators modernise their Digital BSS/OSS processes, eliminate manual workarounds, and ensure accurate orchestration and service activation, the customer experience improves naturally.
This is particularly true for enterprise and wholesale customers, where CX is defined by precision, predictability, and contract performance. Improving CX requires improving the processes beneath it.

13. How do Hansen’s solutions fit into a Tier-1 telco transformation strategy?

Hansen provides cloud-native, API-driven, TMF-compliant, AI-powered Digital BSS/OSS modules that integrate smoothly into hybrid and legacy environments. Operators can use them to strengthen catalog agility, automate order flows, unify data, enhance monetisation, or improve service reliability – without needing to replace their entire BSS/OSS stack.
This flexibility supports transformation at the operator’s own pace, aligned to business priorities, regulatory requirements, and commercial objectives.

14. What benefits can operators expect from a layered or hybrid modernisation approach?

A layered or hybrid approach allows operators to combine existing systems with cloud-native components, enabling transformation without disruption. Key benefits include:
• Faster time-to-market for new offers
• Improved order accuracy and reduced fallout
• Lower cost-to-serve through automation
• Stronger customer experience
• Gradual reduction of technical debt
• Alignment with ODA and modular architecture principles
This approach balances stability with innovation – ideal for Tier-1 operators.

15. How do industry standards such as ODA accelerate telecom digital transformation?

Industry standards like TM Forum ODA and TMF Open APIs reduce integration complexity, promote interoperability, and give operators a trusted blueprint for modernisation. They ensure that new BSS/OSS components can plug into existing environments without custom engineering.
By reducing dependence on bespoke integrations and enabling modular deployment, standards significantly lower long-term cost and accelerate transformation across the business. They also future proof the architecture for new technologies, including AI, automation, and 5G service innovation.


 
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus vestibulum ut neque eu cursus. Donec eu lectus dictum, convallis lectus eget, porta lorem. Aliquam at lacus rutrum est viverra sollicitudin id eu diam. Sed magna diam, porttitor sed justo a, sodales convallis massa. Nam scelerisque diam in justo pharetra aliquam.