Skip to content

True Catalog-Driven Order Management … Finally

Insights True Catalog-Driven Order Management … Finally
Hansen News
Written By

Hansen News

For communication service providers, order fulfilment is at the heart of the business. Customer expectations are extremely high and service providers need to fulfil orders quickly and with the highest degree of accuracy.

Today’s consumers and businesses alike want the ability to turn on new digital services instantly from any device, on any platform, over the phone or online with as little friction as possible.

So why haven’t CSPs been able to give their customers the agility and service excellence they desire when it comes to fulfilling orders? Why is order fallout, especially for new products, so high? Why is it still so costly and time-consuming for IT to support the order automation of new products?

The problem lies in a fundamentally flawed approach to order management. Legacy order management systems prevent service providers from quickly delivering new products, drive up costs with inefficient integration and contribute to high levels of order fallout.

A Bottleneck for Launching New Products

All order management software vendors would claim today that they are catalog-driven. But for many vendors this means embedding a product catalog uniquely architected to work only within their order management system. This means that when the CSP describes a new product in the central product catalog they then have to swivel chair over to the embedded catalog and add the new product all over again, often in a very different format – always with very different tools. This “waterfall” approach to order management is costly, time-consuming and is error-prone even for making minor changes to existing product specifications.

Another approach we see with legacy order management is to have the system pull data from disparate systems.  While a better approach than a manually updated embedded product catalog, this approach assumes data across repositories is pre-synced. To handle the synchronisation, dedicated teams are put in place to handle synchronisation and de-bugging of the data across multiple systems. Any change to product rules and constraints has to be updated by these teams to suit each systems’ unique needs.

What do both of these approaches have in common? In both models each business unit keeps its products, rules and restrictions living in a separate silo. This creates an information disconnect that makes launching new products a long, labor-intensive process.

Separate order and product catalogs

Order decomposition today is usually handled by a legacy order management system interacting with its embedded catalog. Because order capture may have been done using the product specification found in the central catalog, it may not link directly with the embedded order management catalog. These separate catalog definitions run inefficiently and result a very costly form of order fallout.

Inefficient FULFILMENT workflows

Order management systems all come with some process or workflow design tool. This tool is used to model all of the steps needed to process a given order. Over time these business processes become more and more complex as more steps are added. So what happens at run-time?  When an order enters the order management system the unwieldy process is invoked and begins to perform order tasks. While many of the tasks are not required at run-time – there is no intelligence applied to analyse each incoming order, and optimise the process to the specific order requirements.  The result for operators is extra tasks being performed that may not need to be executed at all.

A truly catalog-driven approach for order management

In order to take full advantage of a centrally deployed product catalog, CSPs need to pay careful attention to the APIs needed to interact with the catalog during run-time operations. A real-time catalog-driven architecture provides a rich set of interfaces to select up-to-date products, apply product rules & constraints and decompose a product order efficiently. The software must be highly performant and be available to service the transaction volume.

With real-time catalog APIs allowing unfettered access to product, service and resource specifications many of these problems are eliminated. There is no need to manually clone the master product data or to convert it into a format the target system can understand. Instead, the order management system has its own embedded version of the central product catalog that it can query at run-time to perform product decomposition.

In an advanced catalog-driven order management system what you model at design time is what you fulfil at runtime. Whatever you put in your catalog, you will be able to fulfil and realise. Breaking down orders into actionable items is much easier because it is all feeding off the master data management.

End to End visualizations

With an integrated master product catalog, CSPs can rapidly model new products, change existing products and validate the end-to-end configurations at design time, prior to deploying the run-time environment. Event-based modelling shows every step of the customer experience throughout the order. With a real-time catalog-driven order management system, CSPs are able to do real time validation of orders against the catalog during run-time and test it before it goes out in design-time.

Automation and In-Flight Changes

The end result is a modern architecture allowing product and marketing teams to adapt their offerings quickly, while delivery and operations teams can extend configurations for fulfilment using the same master model.

In a digital world where customers expect compelling new products at the flick of a switch, it is far too costly to be encumbered inefficient legacy systems.  The industry’s first truly real-time, catalog-driven order management system is now available to help CSPs achieve drastic reductions in cost to market, time to market and order fallout.

1. What does “modernise with precision” mean for Tier-1 telecom operators?

“Modernise with precision” describes a low-risk, targeted approach to BSS/OSS modernisation where operators upgrade only the parts of their digital stack that create the greatest impact. Instead of embarking on high-risk, multi-year full-stack replacements, Tier-1 telcos selectively introduce cloud-native BSS/OSS, API-driven telecom architecture, AI-ready data layers, and TMF-compliant BSS components.
This modular strategy reduces cost and disruption, allowing operators to strengthen areas such as product agility, order orchestration, customer experience, and operational efficiency while maintaining stability in core environments. It aligns directly with TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA), which encourages a composable, interoperable, future-proof approach to telco transformation.

2. Why is time-to-market so important for telecom monetisation today?

Telecom monetisation increasingly depends on the ability to respond quickly to new commercial opportunities – from enterprise IoT solutions and digital services to 5G monetisation, wholesale partnerships, and B2B vertical offerings. In this environment, operators that can design, package, and activate new services in days rather than months gain a clear revenue advantage.
Legacy catalogues, rigid product hierarchies, and tightly coupled BSS architectures make rapid innovation difficult. Modern operators therefore prioritise catalog-driven architecture, agile/composable BSS, and cloud-native BSS capabilities to give business teams control over offer creation without relying on long IT delivery cycles. Faster launch cycles = faster monetisation.

 

3. What is slowing down product launch cycles for many telcos?

The primary obstacles are deeply entrenched in legacy architecture: hard-coded product models, outdated catalogues, nonstandard integrations, and heavy IT dependencies. These constraints slow down even minor product changes, creating friction between commercial teams and IT.
Modern telcos are replacing these bottlenecks with TMF-compliant BSS, cloud-native catalogues, API-driven BSS integrated via TMF Open APIs, and low/no-code configuration tools. These solutions allow product owners to create and test offers independently, ensuring the Digital BSS backbone supports true agility.

4. How can telecom operators reduce order fallout and manual intervention?

Order fallout typically stems from fragmented systems, inconsistent data models, and brittle custom integrations across BSS/OSS chains. When orchestration spans numerous legacy systems, even small discrepancies can cause orders to fail.
Operators can dramatically reduce fallout rates by adopting zero-touch service orchestration, modern order management modernisation, end-to-end automation, and a unified data model across their Digital OSS and Digital BSS layers. Cloud-native telecom systems and order orchestration for telecom remove reliance on manual rework, minimise delays, and improve service accuracy – all essential to delivering predictable customer experiences.

5. Why is accuracy so important for B2B and wholesale customer experience?

For enterprise and wholesale customers, trust is built on precision. A single misquote, incorrect configuration, or missed activation can lead to delays, SLA breaches, revenue disputes, and strained relationships. These segments rely on highly controlled, predictable fulfilment processes – particularly as operators expand into 5G edge services, network slicing, managed security, and outcome-based contracts.
Improving accuracy requires strengthening the underlying architecture – through modern CPQ for telecom, clean data models, cloud-native BSS/OSS, and robust API-driven telecom architecture. When quoting, ordering, provisioning, and billing are accurate, customer satisfaction increases naturally.

6. How does cloud, AI, and API-driven architecture support telecom modernisation?

Cloud-native platforms provide the scalability, flexibility, and deployment speed needed to support modern telecom services. AI introduces intelligence into operations, enabling predictive analytics, anomaly detection, and proactive assurance. APIs – especially TMF Open APIs – ensure new components integrate cleanly with legacy systems.
Together, AI-powered BSS/OSS, cloud-native architecture, and API-driven integration create a digital foundation that supports continuous innovation, reduces technical debt, and enables operators to deliver new services more efficiently. This trio is central to future-proofing the telco stack.

7. What is TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA) and why does it matter?

TM Forum’s Open Digital Architecture (ODA) is an industry-standard framework designed to help telcos simplify, modularise, and modernise their BSS/OSS environments. ODA promotes interoperability, composability, and openness so operators can integrate new capabilities without heavy customisation or vendor lock-in.
For Tier-1 operators, ODA serves as a blueprint for transitioning from monolithic legacy stacks to cloud-native, API-driven, modular BSS/OSS infrastructure. By adopting ODA-aligned solutions, operators speed up integration, lower deployment risk, and reduce long-term operational cost.

8. How is Hansen involved in TM Forum and ODA?

Hansen aligns its architecture directly to TM Forum’s ODA principles and has contributed to the development of one of TM Forum’s recognised industry standards. This reinforces a commitment not just to following best practices, but to shaping them.
Hansen’s portfolio of cloud-native, AI-powered, API-driven Digital BSS/OSS modules is built on TMF Open APIs and composable design principles. This ensures seamless interoperability in multivendor environments and helps operators modernise safely and incrementally.

9. Can operators modernise their BSS/OSS without a full-stack replacement?

Yes – and in fact, most Tier-1 operators now prefer incremental transformation. Full-stack replacement is high risk, slow, and expensive. By contrast, modular modernisation allows operators to introduce new BSS/OSS capabilities – catalogues, orchestration layers, charging engines, customer management, monetisation components – without destabilising the existing ecosystem.
This approach reduces risk, accelerates value, and aligns with ODA’s principles of composability and openness. Operators can modernise at their own pace while still maintaining service continuity.

10. How does modular modernisation reduce risk?

Modular transformation focuses on improving specific parts of the architecture – such as product agility, order accuracy, unified data, or 5G monetisation – without changing everything at once. Each module is integrated, tested, and scaled independently, which reduces disruption and improves predictability.
It also allows operators to retire legacy systems gradually, reducing technical debt over time while still realising near-term efficiency and revenue gains. This is why agile/composable BSS is now the preferred model for Tier-1 telecom transformation.

11. What operational improvements can telcos expect from a unified data model?

A unified, AI-ready data model brings real-time visibility across commercial and operational processes, enabling faster decision-making and more reliable service execution. It also allows operators to detect issues earlier, automate root cause analysis, and reduce order fallout.
This consistent data foundation is essential for AI-powered BSS/OSS, predictive assurance, next-best-action recommendations, and advanced analytics. It ultimately improves operational efficiency, accuracy, and customer experience – three core pillars of modern telecom performance.

12. Why is Customer Experience (CX) tightly linked to operational excellence?

Most customer experience problems – delays, incorrect orders, billing errors, missed SLAs – originate from inefficiencies within the internal BSS/OSS engine. When operators modernise their Digital BSS/OSS processes, eliminate manual workarounds, and ensure accurate orchestration and service activation, the customer experience improves naturally.
This is particularly true for enterprise and wholesale customers, where CX is defined by precision, predictability, and contract performance. Improving CX requires improving the processes beneath it.

13. How do Hansen’s solutions fit into a Tier-1 telco transformation strategy?

Hansen provides cloud-native, API-driven, TMF-compliant, AI-powered Digital BSS/OSS modules that integrate smoothly into hybrid and legacy environments. Operators can use them to strengthen catalog agility, automate order flows, unify data, enhance monetisation, or improve service reliability – without needing to replace their entire BSS/OSS stack.
This flexibility supports transformation at the operator’s own pace, aligned to business priorities, regulatory requirements, and commercial objectives.

14. What benefits can operators expect from a layered or hybrid modernisation approach?

A layered or hybrid approach allows operators to combine existing systems with cloud-native components, enabling transformation without disruption. Key benefits include:
• Faster time-to-market for new offers
• Improved order accuracy and reduced fallout
• Lower cost-to-serve through automation
• Stronger customer experience
• Gradual reduction of technical debt
• Alignment with ODA and modular architecture principles
This approach balances stability with innovation – ideal for Tier-1 operators.

15. How do industry standards such as ODA accelerate telecom digital transformation?

Industry standards like TM Forum ODA and TMF Open APIs reduce integration complexity, promote interoperability, and give operators a trusted blueprint for modernisation. They ensure that new BSS/OSS components can plug into existing environments without custom engineering.
By reducing dependence on bespoke integrations and enabling modular deployment, standards significantly lower long-term cost and accelerate transformation across the business. They also future proof the architecture for new technologies, including AI, automation, and 5G service innovation.


 
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus vestibulum ut neque eu cursus. Donec eu lectus dictum, convallis lectus eget, porta lorem. Aliquam at lacus rutrum est viverra sollicitudin id eu diam. Sed magna diam, porttitor sed justo a, sodales convallis massa. Nam scelerisque diam in justo pharetra aliquam.